Business Challenge
Naver, Korea's search engine, has introduced visit-verified reviews to combat abusive reviews for local businesses. Unfortunately, its incentive system attracted cherry pickers, leaving meaningless reviews solely for rewards, negatively impacting local businesses and genuine reviewers.
Problem statement
To obtain sufficient reviews without incentives, It becomes crucial to encourage genuine reviewers to write quality reviews. Through user interviews, I discovered the opportunity for a reaction and its needs from reviewers and users.
Success Metrics : Reaction Counts (For short term), Reviewer Retention/Activation (For long term)
My Design Process
Impact
Background
Opportunity found from user interviews
"When I see reviews from people with similar experiences, I want to express my agreement. Now I can't express it, so I just peek at their profile."
"I somtimes wanted to leave a reaction, if a review was exact or detailed. But there was nothing I could."
"I don't think I will actively leave a comment, but it would be great if I could press a 'helpful' button for a review."
"I would feel delighted to share my pleasant feelings at certain places with others."
"It would feel great to get a notification that my review was helpful."
"I am worried about comments because although I left a sincere comment, others may say it's not."
Design Direction
Design Journey
Our reviewers and users come from diverse backgrounds, and thus, its crucial for the reaction feature to be universally understandable and accessible.
When it comes to the reaction feature, it is important to include a sufficient variety of options for users to express their feelings. This will help maximize user engagement.
Our reviewers love sharing their experiences to help others looking for information about spots. Therefore, the reaction feature should motivate them in a meaningful way to continue writing reviews.
Research 01
Reaction version 1
This was intentionally added instead of just "Ok" option because many users leave comments indicating that how much they are familiar with it described in the posts.
Research 02
Reaction version 2
Many respondents considered the “I’ll visit later” and “Looks good” reactions to be too similar, so we merged these into a single reaction called “I want to go”.
We added “Funny” which was the most suggested option.
About 75% of the respondents wanted to express negative reaction, but reviewers were worried about receiving direct opposition. Therefore, we decided to add negative reactions in more neutral and gentle tone like "Umm."
"Agreed" was ranked as the least useful by respondents because they found it was too specific. Instead, the majority of them wanted to express empathy with the reviewers' feelings. As a result, we changed "Agreed" to "I relate.”
However, users expressed that they would not typically use the rection "Agreed". Nonetheless, they still wanted to indicate that they had visited the place mentioned in a review. Reviewers also wanted to know if the reactions were from previous visitors. Therefore, I designed a feature to display the visit status of those leaving reactions.
Reaction version 3
All participants did not realize that they could input multiple reactions. They also indicated that they would not leave multiple reactions and feel annoyed when prompted to do so.
Some participants misunderstood the meaning of "I relate" as simply agreement, rather than the empathy in a broader sense that we intended. To clarify, we have decided to narrow it down to "Sad," which empathy for unsatisfied experiences.
I designed the reaction feature to be compact due to limited space. However, this sometimes made it difficult for users to quickly find the reaction buttons. To improve its visibility, I added a tooltip to the reaction button.
Reaction version 4
Reaction version 5
The negative/neutral expression, 'Umm', is excluded due to the potential use for aggressive expression towards our local business owners or our reviewers.
These specifications may enable more authentic interaction, but they are not essential for the reaction feature itself. Therefore, we exclude these specs for the launching version.
Problem 01
Problem 02
Reaction version 6
The product manager and I decided to replace the term 'Sad,' which was being used abusively, with 'Cool' instead of simply removing it. Because some users expressed the desire for a simpler reaction option without specific intentions, such as 'like' or 'thumbs up'.
I changed the tab UI to match the tab UI on the "Place End" page. This is because users mostly engage in reactions on that page.
Final Design
Feature 1. Reaction Button
Feature 2. Reaction Notifications
Since visit-verified reviews are a part of the Naver app, it is important to control the notifications to avoid annoying users. Therefore, we have decided to send two types of notifications in the launching version and track the users' satisfaction.
Feature 3. The List of Who Left Reactions
Feature 4. My Reactions Page
Impacts & Takeaways
Previous Project
Next Project